Double-Blind Review

Understanding our anonymous peer review process

What is Double-Blind Review?

Double-blind review means that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other throughout the review process. This helps ensure fair, unbiased evaluations based solely on the quality of the work.

How It Works

Authors Don't See

  • • Reviewer names
  • • Reviewer emails
  • • Reviewer affiliations
  • • Private notes to editors

Reviewers Don't See

  • • Author names
  • • Author emails
  • • Author affiliations
  • • Other reviewers' identities

Benefits

Reduced Bias

Reviews are based on content quality, not author reputation or affiliation.

Honest Feedback

Reviewers can provide candid critiques without fear of professional repercussions.

Merit-Based Evaluation

Early-career researchers and established academics are evaluated equally.

Professional Relationships Preserved

Critical feedback doesn't affect future collaborations or personal relationships.

What Authors See

Review from "Reviewer 1"

Recommendation

Minor Revisions

Rating

4.0 / 5.0

Comments

The paper presents interesting findings, but the methodology section needs more detail...

Date

January 15, 2026

Notice: No reviewer name, email, or affiliation is shown

What Reviewers See

Paper for Review

Title

Machine Learning Applications in Climate Science

Theme

Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This paper explores the application of deep learning techniques...

Paper Files

paper_v1.pdf

Notice: No author information is displayed

Who Has Full Access?

Some roles have access to both author and reviewer information:

Conference Chairs

Full access to manage the entire review process across all themes.

Theme Leaders

Full access to submissions and reviews within their assigned themes.

Important Note

Theme leaders and chairs can review their own submissions. This is intentional, as they have oversight responsibility. The system tracks all actions for accountability.

Tips for Authors

  • Remove identifying information from your paper before submission
  • Avoid self-citations that reveal your identity
  • Check document properties for hidden author information
  • Use neutral language when referring to your previous work

Tips for Reviewers

  • Focus on the content, not trying to guess the author's identity
  • Provide constructive feedback that helps improve the work
  • Be objective and evaluate based on established criteria
  • Avoid including identifying information in your review