Double-Blind Review
Understanding our anonymous peer review process
What is Double-Blind Review?
Double-blind review means that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other throughout the review process. This helps ensure fair, unbiased evaluations based solely on the quality of the work.
How It Works
Authors Don't See
- • Reviewer names
- • Reviewer emails
- • Reviewer affiliations
- • Private notes to editors
Reviewers Don't See
- • Author names
- • Author emails
- • Author affiliations
- • Other reviewers' identities
Benefits
Reduced Bias
Reviews are based on content quality, not author reputation or affiliation.
Honest Feedback
Reviewers can provide candid critiques without fear of professional repercussions.
Merit-Based Evaluation
Early-career researchers and established academics are evaluated equally.
Professional Relationships Preserved
Critical feedback doesn't affect future collaborations or personal relationships.
What Authors See
Review from "Reviewer 1"
Recommendation
Minor RevisionsRating
Comments
The paper presents interesting findings, but the methodology section needs more detail...
Date
January 15, 2026
Notice: No reviewer name, email, or affiliation is shown
What Reviewers See
Paper for Review
Title
Machine Learning Applications in Climate Science
Theme
Artificial IntelligenceAbstract
This paper explores the application of deep learning techniques...
Paper Files
Notice: No author information is displayed
Who Has Full Access?
Some roles have access to both author and reviewer information:
Conference Chairs
Full access to manage the entire review process across all themes.
Theme Leaders
Full access to submissions and reviews within their assigned themes.
Important Note
Theme leaders and chairs can review their own submissions. This is intentional, as they have oversight responsibility. The system tracks all actions for accountability.
Tips for Authors
- Remove identifying information from your paper before submission
- Avoid self-citations that reveal your identity
- Check document properties for hidden author information
- Use neutral language when referring to your previous work
Tips for Reviewers
- Focus on the content, not trying to guess the author's identity
- Provide constructive feedback that helps improve the work
- Be objective and evaluate based on established criteria
- Avoid including identifying information in your review