Handling Revisions
Respond to reviewer feedback and upload revised papers
When Are Revisions Requested?
After reviewers evaluate your paper, the theme leader may request revisions before making a final decision. This is common in academic publishing and gives you a chance to strengthen your work.
Revision Types
Minor Revisions
Small corrections needed. Usually formatting, typos, or minor clarifications. Quick turnaround expected.
Major Revisions
Significant changes needed. May require additional analysis, restructuring, or addressing substantial concerns.
Revision Process
Step 1: Review Feedback
Read all reviewer comments carefully. Understand what changes are required.
Step 2: Make Changes
Update your paper to address each point raised by reviewers.
Step 3: Prepare Response
Write a detailed response explaining how you addressed each concern.
Step 4: Upload Revision
Upload your revised paper along with the response document.
Writing Your Response
A good response to reviewers is crucial. Here's how to structure it:
Quote Each Comment
Start each response by quoting the reviewer's original comment.
Explain Your Response
Describe what you changed and where to find it in the paper.
Be Professional
Thank reviewers for their feedback, even if you disagree with some points.
Version History
Each revision creates a new version. You can view all versions on your submission page.
Paper Versions
Version 3 - Revision 2
Uploaded Jan 20, 2026
Addressed minor formatting issues raised in second review.
Version 2 - Revision 1
Uploaded Jan 15, 2026
Major revisions addressing methodology concerns.
Version 1 - Original
Uploaded Jan 1, 2026
Tips for Successful Revisions
Address Every Point
Don't skip any reviewer comments, even minor ones.
Highlight Changes
Use track changes or highlight modified sections.
Be Specific
Reference page numbers and sections in your response.
Meet Deadlines
Submit revisions by the requested deadline.