Submitting Reviews

Complete guide for reviewers submitting paper reviews

Your Role as a Reviewer

As an assigned reviewer, you evaluate papers based on their quality, methodology, and contribution to the field. Your feedback helps authors improve their work and assists editors in making decisions.

Accessing Your Assignments

1. Go to Reviewer Dashboard

Access the conference and select your reviewer role.

2. View Assigned Papers

See all papers assigned to you with their current status.

3. Select a Paper

Click on a paper to download files and submit your review.

Review Form

Paper Review Form

Criteria Ratings

OriginalityRequired
MethodologyRequired
PresentationRequired

Recommendation

AcceptMinor RevisionsMajor RevisionsReject

Overall Comments

Provide detailed feedback for the authors...

Recommendation Options

Accept

Paper is ready for publication. No significant changes needed.

Minor Revisions

Small improvements needed. Typically formatting, typos, or clarifications.

Major Revisions

Significant changes required. May need additional data or restructuring.

Reject

Paper is not suitable for publication in its current form.

Save Draft vs Submit

Save as Draft

  • • Saves your progress
  • • Can return to edit later
  • • Not visible to editors
  • • Not counted as complete

Submit Review

  • • Finalizes your review
  • • Cannot be edited after
  • • Visible to editors
  • • Counted toward required

Reviewing Revised Papers

When an author submits a revised version (version 2 or later), you may be assigned to review the updated paper. The review form includes a "Your Previous Reviews" section to help you assess how well the author addressed your earlier feedback.

Your Previous Reviews

This section appears automatically when you have reviewed earlier versions of the same paper. Each previous review is shown in a collapsible panel organised by version.

  • Recommendation badge — your previous recommendation (Accept, Minor Revisions, etc.) shown as a colour-coded badge
  • Criteria ratings — star ratings and text responses you gave for each review criterion
  • Overall comments — your detailed feedback from the earlier version

Previous reviews are read-only. They are provided for reference so you can compare the revised paper against your earlier feedback. Your new review is submitted independently for the current version.

Writing Effective Reviews

Be Constructive

Offer specific suggestions for improvement, not just criticism.

Be Specific

Reference specific sections, pages, or paragraphs in your feedback.

Be Thorough

Cover all aspects: methodology, results, writing quality, and contribution.

Be Professional

Maintain a respectful tone even when pointing out weaknesses.